In Control, the Celeron G6900 is slightly faster than the Xeon E3-1270. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 10 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 46 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1270
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E3-1270: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$87.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E3-1270 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Xeon E3-1270 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1270
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1270 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1155 |
46W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
