In Control, the Celeron G6900 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 46 vs 350 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 255 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer – Jul 30, 2025 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 3 years and 6 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9960X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Jul 30th, 2025
Average FPS
255 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1409.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Jul 30th, 2025
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
3108
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
25837
100%
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 9960X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
4 MB
3%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Jul 30th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X Jul 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2025 |
$52.00 | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | sTR5 |
46W | Power Consumption | 350W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
