In Rust, the Celeron G6900 is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Up to 2% faster in Rust – 228 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Aug 10, 2017
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 46 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
224 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
95%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
$52.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | SP3r2 |
46W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
