Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 912 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $49.99 vs $126.99
- Up to 61% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.26 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6904 minutes ago
Buy for $126.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6905 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |