In Control, the Celeron G6900 is slightly faster than the Opteron 3365. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jun 30, 2013
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 29% less energy – 46 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 29% less energy
Opteron 3365
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Opteron 3365: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Opteron 3365 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Opteron 3365 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Opteron 3365
Jun 30th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
39%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Opteron 3365 Jun 30th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 30th, 2013 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM3+ |
46W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
