In Control, the Celeron G6900 is slightly faster than the FX-6350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 8 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 46 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
FX-6350
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs FX-6350: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
245 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs FX-6350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs FX-6350 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
FX-6350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | AM3+ |
46W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
