In The Callisto Protocol, the Celeron G6900 is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Consumes up to 63% less energy – 46 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 63% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 39% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 172 vs 124 FPS
- Up to 39% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
172 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
125 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
13%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
75%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2024 |
$52.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1851 |
46W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
