In Control, the Celeron G6900 is slightly faster than the Core i7-970. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jul 19, 2010
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 65% less energy – 46 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 65% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-970
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-970: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Average FPS
245 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
98%
Price, $
$229.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-970 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Core i7-970 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-970 Jul 19th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 19th, 2010 |
| $52.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1366 |
46W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
