Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 61 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $49.99 vs $144.59
- Up to 61% better value when playing Borderlands 3 than Core i5-12600KF - $0.23 vs $0.59 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 10% better in Borderlands 3 than Celeron G6900 - 245 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
222
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
39%
Price, $
$144.59
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $144.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |