In Deathloop, the Celeron G6900 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G6900
- Consumes up to 21% less energy – 46 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 21% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 2 years and 3 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 04, 2022
- Is 2 years and 3 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G6900 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
230 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G6900 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G6900 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G6900 Jan 4th, 2022 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$52.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1700 |
46 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
