Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2592 days newer than Celeron G550.
Advantages of Celeron G550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G550 - 542 vs 502 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 16 vs 2 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
542
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$126.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $126.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7506 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G550 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |