In Control, the Celeron G530 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G530
- Consumes up to 64% less energy – 65 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 64% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Sep 04, 2011
- Is 5 years and 11 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G530 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G530 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G530 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1920X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G530
Sep 4th, 2011
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G530 Sep 4th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | SP3r2 |
65W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
