Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Celeron G4900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $29.29 vs $426.84
- Up to 85% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-14900K - $0.11 vs $0.71 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 135% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G4900 - 605 vs 257 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
257
42%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
605
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
15%
Price, $
$426.84
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $426.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900 | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |