In Deathloop, the Celeron G4900 is slightly slower than the Core i7-13700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $480 cheaper!
Celeron G4900
- Up to 94% cheaper – $29.52 vs $509.86
- Up to 94% cheaper
- Up to 94% better value in Deathloop – $0.13 vs $2.12/FPS
- Up to 94% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop – 240 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Apr 03, 2018
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G4900 vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
222 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
92%
Price, $
$29.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
240 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
180 FPS
100%
Price, $
$509.86
5%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
6%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900 vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900 vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
43%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G4900 Apr 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 3rd, 2018 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
$42.00 | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
