In Atomfall, the Celeron G4900 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7500T. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $101 cheaper!
Celeron G4900
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer – Apr 03, 2018 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 1 year and 2 months newer
- Up to 77% cheaper – $29.52 vs $130.43
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Atomfall – $0.15 vs $0.64/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Atomfall
Core i5-7500T
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 202 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G4900 vs Core i5-7500T: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
190 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
93%
Price, $
$29.52
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
202 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
152 FPS
100%
Price, $
$130.43
22%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
23%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900 vs Core i5-7500T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900 vs Core i5-7500T in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-7500T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G4900 Apr 3rd, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7500T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| $42.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 54 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
