The Celeron G4900 is a clear winner – it's a slightly faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-3330 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $109.31 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G4900
- A slightly faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 55% cheaper – $89.69 vs $199.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 30% less energy – 54 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-3330
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G4900 vs Core i5-3330 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
190
100%
Min 1% FPS
134
100%
Price, $
$89.69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Celeron G4900 vs Core i5-3330 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G4900 vs Core i5-3330 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G4900 vs Core i5-3330 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G4900
Apr 3rd, 2018
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i5-3330
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G4900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-3330 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| $42.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
54 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.2 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
