Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $39.00 vs $744.99
- Up to 93% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.10 vs $1.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 31% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G3930T - 490 vs 375 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 32 vs 2 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Buy for $744.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |