Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Celeron G3930T
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $39.00 vs $849.99
- Up to 95% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-13400F - $0.35 vs $6.80 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 14% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G3930T - 125 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7320 minutes ago
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7320 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |