In Atomfall, the Celeron G3930 is slightly faster than the Xeon W3530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G3930
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 51 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3530
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs Xeon W3530: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs Xeon W3530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs Xeon W3530 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon W3530
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3530 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
51W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
