In Atomfall, the Celeron G3930 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5630. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G3930
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 51 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5630
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs Xeon E5630: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$28.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs Xeon E5630 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs Xeon E5630 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5630
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5630 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
51W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
