In Elden Ring, the Celeron G3930 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5540. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G3930
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 51 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5540
- Up to 1% faster in Elden Ring – 139 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Elden Ring
Elden Ring FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs Xeon E5540: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
138 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
98 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs Xeon E5540 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs Xeon E5540 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Xeon E5540
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
44%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5540 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $774.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
51W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
