In Atomfall, the Celeron G3930 is slightly faster than the FX-8300 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $77 cheaper!
Celeron G3930
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 73% cheaper – $29.00 vs $106.06
- Up to 73% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Atomfall – $0.15 vs $0.56/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
99%
Price, $
$106.06
27%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
27%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
51W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
