The Celeron G3930 is a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-4300, however, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $22.38 more expensive!
Advantages of the Celeron G3930
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of the FX-4300
- Up to 32% cheaper – $48.02 vs $70.40
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3930 vs FX-4300 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
688
100%
Min 1% FPS
355
100%
Price, $
$70.4
68%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
70%
Celeron G3930 vs FX-4300 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
78%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3930 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
51 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1866 MHz |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
