In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G3930 is faster than the Core Ultra 7 265 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $319 cheaper!
Celeron G3930
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 197 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 92% cheaper – $29.00 vs $347.55
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 93% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.14 vs $2.04/FPS
- Up to 93% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265
- Is 8 years and 4 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 4 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs Core Ultra 7 265: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
197 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
170 FPS
86%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
86%
Price, $
$347.55
8%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
7%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs Core Ultra 7 265 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
38%
Core Ultra 7 265
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265 Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1851 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 32EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
