Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900 is 840 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-9900 - $70.40 vs $667.41
- Up to 89% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Core i9-9900 - $0.43 vs $3.84 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 6% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Celeron G3930 - 174 vs 164 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
164
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
Buy for $667.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 283 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i9-9900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |