In Atomfall, the Celeron G3930 is slightly slower than the Core i7-970. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $201 cheaper!
Celeron G3930
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jul 19, 2010
- Is 6 years and 5 months newer
- Up to 87% cheaper – $29.00 vs $229.95
- Up to 87% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in Atomfall – $0.15 vs $1.21/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 51 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-970
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 190 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs Core i7-970: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
189 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Average FPS
190 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.95
12%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs Core i7-970 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs Core i7-970 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Core i7-970
Jul 19th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-970 Jul 19th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 19th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1366 |
51W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
