Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Celeron G3930
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $70.40 vs $273.18
- Up to 68% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-14700F - $0.63 vs $1.99 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 22% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 137 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 28 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $70.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1300 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.99/FPS
32%
Price, $
$273.18
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1299 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3930 | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 20 |
2 | Threads | 28 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |