In Atomfall, the Celeron G3930 is slower than the Core i3-14100. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $120 cheaper!
Celeron G3930
- Up to 81% cheaper – $29.00 vs $149.35
- Up to 81% cheaper
- Up to 77% better value in Atomfall – $0.15 vs $0.65/FPS
- Up to 77% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 51 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall – 229 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G3930 vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
189 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
142 FPS
83%
Price, $
$29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
19%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
23%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3930 vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3930 vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3930
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
50%
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3930 Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2400 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 610 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
