In Control, the Celeron G3900 is same performance as the Xeon E3-1230. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G3900
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 4 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 51 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1230
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs Xeon E3-1230: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
99%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Xeon E3-1230 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Xeon E3-1230 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1230
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1230 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1155 |
51W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
