In Control, the Celeron G3900 is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $806 cheaper!
Celeron G3900
- Up to 95% cheaper – $44.04 vs $850.00
- Up to 95% cheaper
- Up to 95% better value in Control – $0.17 vs $3.44/FPS
- Up to 95% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 51 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 247 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 1 year and 11 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
245 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
99%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
247 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
5%
Value, $/FPS
$3.44/FPS
5%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $999.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | SP3r2 |
51W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
