In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron G3900 is slightly faster than the Ryzen 9 9900X3D and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $525 cheaper!
Celeron G3900
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 92% cheaper – $44.04 vs $569.00
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 93% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.22 vs $3.25/FPS
- Up to 93% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 51 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 06, 2025 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
198 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
149 FPS
100%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Average FPS
175 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
88%
Price, $
$569
7%
Value, $/FPS
$3.25/FPS
7%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 9 9900X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
4 MB
3%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Jan 6th, 2025
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 9900X3D Jan 6th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
51W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
