Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $39.90 vs $495.36
- Up to 90% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.24 vs $2.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 51 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 22% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G3900 - 203 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
167
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7618 minutes ago
Buy for $495.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7618 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 170 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |