In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G3900 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 7 8700G. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $240 cheaper!
Celeron G3900
- Up to 85% cheaper – $44.04 vs $284.22
- Up to 85% cheaper
- Up to 70% better value in Battlefield 6 – $0.72 vs $2.38/FPS
- Up to 70% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Ryzen 7 8700G
- Up to 95% faster in Battlefield 6 – 119 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 95% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 7 8700G: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
61 FPS
51%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
52%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 8700G
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
119 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
89 FPS
100%
Price, $
$284.22
15%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
30%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 7 8700G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Ryzen 7 8700G in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
67%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
41%
Ryzen 7 8700G
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 8700G Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $329.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM5 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | Radeon 780M |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
