In Atomfall, the Celeron G3900 is same performance as the FX-8370. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $208 cheaper!
Celeron G3900
- Is 11 months and 29 days newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 11 months and 29 days newer
- Up to 83% cheaper – $44.04 vs $252.02
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 83% better value in Atomfall – $0.23 vs $1.33/FPS
- Up to 83% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
FX-8370
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$252.02
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
17%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
51W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
