In Control, the Celeron G3900 is same performance as the FX-8350. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $214 cheaper!
Celeron G3900
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Sep 01, 2015 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
- Up to 83% cheaper – $44.04 vs $258.02
- Up to 83% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in Control – $0.17 vs $1.05/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
FX-8350
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs FX-8350: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$258.02
17%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs FX-8350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs FX-8350 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | AM3+ |
51W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
