Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 2256 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Celeron G3900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $39.90 vs $283.49
- Up to 67% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i9-12900K - $0.52 vs $1.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 131% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G3900 - 178 vs 77 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.59/FPS
33%
Price, $
$283.49
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $283.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 296 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900 | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |