In Atomfall, the Celeron G3900 is slower than the Core i7-14700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $362 cheaper!
Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper – $44.04 vs $405.72
- Up to 89% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in Atomfall – $0.23 vs $1.64/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 59% less energy – 51 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 59% less energy
Core i7-14700K
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 190 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 1 month newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs Core i7-14700K: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
190 FPS
77%
Min 1% FPS
143 FPS
78%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$405.72
10%
Value, $/FPS
$1.64/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i7-14700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i7-14700K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-14700K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
