The Celeron G3900 is a clear winner – it's a faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-661 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $44.58 cheaper!
Advantages of the Celeron G3900
- A faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 56% cheaper – $35.42 vs $80.00
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 51 vs 87 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-661
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-661 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, $
$35.42
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-661 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-661 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-661 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
84%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-661
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.33 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
62%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron G3900 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-661 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Skylake | Codename | Clarkdale |
51 W | Power Consumption | 87 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 4 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 2133 MHz, DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
