In Deathloop, the Celeron G3900 is slightly slower than the Core i5-14400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 51 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-14400F
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 231 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 8 years and 4 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-14400F: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
221 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
96%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-14400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-14400F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
44%
Core i5-14400F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
89%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-14400F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
51 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
