In Atomfall, the Celeron G1840 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2689. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1840
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – May 01, 2014 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 54 vs 115 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2689
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 193 vs 188 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G1840 vs Xeon E5-2689: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1840 vs Xeon E5-2689 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1840 vs Xeon E5-2689 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1840
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2689
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1840 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2689 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011 |
54W | Power Consumption | 115W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
