In Control, the Celeron G1840 is same performance as the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1840
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – May 01, 2014 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron G1840 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1840 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1840 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1840
May 1st, 2014
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1840 May 1st, 2014 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
54W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
