In Atomfall, the Celeron G1820 is slightly slower than the Xeon E5540. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1820
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Dec 01, 2013 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 54 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5540
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G1820 vs Xeon E5540: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
186 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1820 vs Xeon E5540 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1820 vs Xeon E5540 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5540
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1820 Dec 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5540 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $774.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1366 |
54W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
