In Battlefield 6, the Celeron G1820 is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 54 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 49% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Dec 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron G1820 vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
61 FPS
59%
Min 1% FPS
46 FPS
60%
Price, $
$99.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1820 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1820 vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1820 Dec 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $799.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM4 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
