In Deathloop, the Celeron G1820 is slightly faster than the FX-9590 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $182 cheaper!
Celeron G1820
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 5 months and 20 days newer – Dec 01, 2013 vs Jun 11, 2013
- Is 5 months and 20 days newer
- Up to 65% cheaper – $99.88 vs $282.02
- Up to 65% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Deathloop – $0.44 vs $1.28/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 75% less energy – 54 vs 220 Watts
- Consumes up to 75% less energy
FX-9590
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G1820 vs FX-9590: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Average FPS
220 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
99%
Price, $
$282.02
35%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1820 vs FX-9590 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1820 vs FX-9590 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-9590
Jun 11th, 2013
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1820 Dec 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-9590 Jun 11th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
54W | Power Consumption | 220W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
