In Atomfall, the Celeron G1820 is slightly slower than the FX-8300. However, it's a slightly better value for money, as it's $6 cheaper!
Celeron G1820
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Dec 01, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Up to 6% cheaper – $99.88 vs $106.06
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Up to 5% better value in Atomfall – $0.53 vs $0.56/FPS
- Up to 5% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
FX-8300
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 188 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G1820 vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
186 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
99%
Price, $
$99.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
95%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1820 vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1820 vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
82%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1820 Dec 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
54W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
