In Atomfall, the Celeron G1820 is slightly slower than the FX-4350 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $17 more expensive!
Celeron G1820
- Is 7 months and 2 days newer – Dec 01, 2013 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 7 months and 2 days newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
FX-4350
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
- Up to 17% cheaper – $82.71 vs $99.88
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 17% better value in Atomfall – $0.44 vs $0.53/FPS
- Up to 17% better value in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron G1820 vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
186 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
99%
Price, $
$99.88
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
83%
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1820 vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1820 vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1820 Dec 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
54W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
