In Deathloop, the Celeron G1820 is same performance as the FX-4300. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $51 more expensive!
Celeron G1820
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer – Dec 01, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 1 year and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
FX-4300
- Up to 51% cheaper – $49.00 vs $99.88
- Up to 51% cheaper
- Up to 50% better value in Deathloop – $0.22 vs $0.44/FPS
- Up to 50% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G1820 vs FX-4300: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.88
49%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
50%
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$49
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1820 vs FX-4300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1820 vs FX-4300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1820 Dec 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
54W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
