Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2895 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $39.59 vs $270.00
- Up to 78% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i9-12900KF - $0.07 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 39% better in Minecraft than Celeron G1820 - 843 vs 605 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
605
72%
Value, $/FPS
$0.07/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |