In Deathloop, the Celeron G1820 is slightly faster than the Core i7-5960X and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $155 cheaper!
Celeron G1820
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 221 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Up to 61% cheaper – $99.88 vs $255.05
- Up to 61% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in Deathloop – $0.45 vs $1.16/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 54 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-5960X
- Is 9 months newer – Sep 01, 2014 vs Dec 01, 2013
- Is 9 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron G1820 vs Core i7-5960X: Comparison of performance and price
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Average FPS
221 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
99%
Price, $
$255.05
39%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron G1820 vs Core i7-5960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron G1820 vs Core i7-5960X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron G1820
Dec 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron G1820 Dec 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-5960X Sep 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
54W | Power Consumption | 140W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
