Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2977 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Celeron G1820
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $39.59 vs $76.80
- Up to 42% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-12100F - $0.21 vs $0.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 53 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 13% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 215 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
190
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for $76.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |